CCalclabhub

Head-to-head

CAC vs LTV

Customer acquisition cost is the price of winning one customer: total sales and marketing spend divided by the number of customers it produced. Lifetime value is the profit that customer generates before they leave. On their own neither number means much, because a high CAC is fine against a high LTV and disastrous against a low one.

The comparison is the point, and it is almost always expressed as a ratio. A business that spends $320 to win a customer worth $1,500 is running at 4.7 to 1, which is healthy. The same $320 against a customer worth $400 is underwater before a single cost of serving them is counted.

The most common error is computing LTV on revenue rather than on contribution. Revenue includes the cost of delivering the product, so an LTV built from gross revenue overstates what the customer is worth by the whole cost of goods. Multiplying revenue by gross margin first is what makes the two sides comparable with CAC, which is a cash cost.

The second error is treating churn as fixed. Lifetime is the reciprocal of churn, so halving churn doubles LTV while halving acquisition cost only improves CAC by the amount actually saved. Retention work usually moves the ratio further per dollar than acquisition work does, and this is visible directly in the arithmetic.

How They Differ

CAC compared with LTV
AttributeCACLTV
What it measuresCost of winning one customerProfit from one customer before they leave
Direction on the P&LA cost, incurred up frontRevenue net of variable cost, earned over time
Typical formulaTotal spend ÷ new customersMonthly contribution ÷ monthly churn
Time frameA single period — usually a quarterThe whole relationship, in months
Sensitivity to churnNone — churn does not enter the calculationEntirely; lifetime is 1 ÷ churn
Healthy benchmarkRecovered within 12 monthsAt least three times CAC
Where it is used in this libraryPricing a channel or a campaignDeciding how much retention is worth

The Same Numbers, Both Ways

$80,000 of sales and marketing spend winning 250 customers, at $80 a month and 75% gross margin with 4% monthly churn.

Total spend
$80,000
New customers
250
Revenue per customer
$80 a month
Gross margin
75%
Monthly churn
4%
Worked example: CAC versus LTV
LineCACLTV
Headline figure$320.00$1,500.00
Time horizonOne quarter of spendThe whole relationship
At 4% monthly churn$320.00$1,500.00
At 8% monthly churn$320.00$750.00
At 2% monthly churn$320.00$3,000.00
Payback5.3 months to recover CAC25 months of contribution

A CAC of $320.00 against an LTV of $1,500.00 is a 4.7 to 1 ratio, and the acquisition cost is recovered in 5.3 months of a 25 month relationship. Doubling churn to 8% halves LTV to $750.00 and the ratio to 2.3 to 1, which is the figure that decides whether the spend is worth repeating.

When To Use Each

CAC

  • You are deciding whether a channel or campaign is worth continuing.
  • You are comparing two acquisition routes with very different conversion rates.
  • You need the payback period in months, which is CAC divided by monthly contribution.

LTV

  • You are deciding how much to spend on retention or onboarding.
  • You are valuing the business, or a cohort, for a forecast or a raise.
  • You are segmenting customers and need to know which cohort is worth acquiring.

Common Questions

What is a good LTV to CAC ratio?

Three to one is the usual floor, and above five to one often means under-investing in growth rather than running efficiently. Below one means each customer destroys value, and between one and three the business only works if fixed costs are very low.

Why use contribution rather than revenue for LTV?

Because CAC is a cash cost and revenue is not cash — it still carries the cost of delivering the product. Multiplying revenue by gross margin gives the part of it that is actually available to pay back the acquisition spend.

How long should CAC payback take?

Under twelve months is the common benchmark for a subscription business, and under six is strong. Payback longer than the expected lifetime means the spend is never recovered, regardless of what the ratio looks like on paper.

Should CAC include salaries?

Yes, for sales and marketing staff whose job is winning customers. Excluding them is the single most common way CAC is understated, and it makes the ratio look better than the cash flow supports.

What if churn is not constant?

Then a single reciprocal overstates or understates lifetime. Real cohorts usually churn fastest early and flatten later, so a blended rate understates LTV for customers who survive the first months. Cohort curves are the honest way to do it.

More Comparisons

  • Contribution Margin vs Gross Margin

    Gross margin deducts cost of goods sold; contribution margin deducts every variable cost. On $500,000 of revenue with $200,000 of COGS and $75,000 of variable selling costs, gross margin is 60% and contribution margin is 45%.

  • ROI vs CAGR

    ROI measures the whole return; CAGR turns it into a compound annual rate. A 100% return over five years is 20% a year by division but 14.87% a year in reality.

All comparisons →

Sources

Both methods sit in Business.